Search for: "In Re: Office of Foreign v."
Results 1 - 20
of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 5:47 pm
Harman v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:47 pm
Harman v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing) Earlier this year, the Supreme Court heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early 2009. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Collection v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:08 pm
The case of In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:04 am
(In re Cyphermint, Inc.) [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:52 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Universal character re nationality and territorial scope. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Today, we’re continuing the prologue of our tour through the law of the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act, surveying the antitrust law of foreign-based transactions in the years leading up to enactment of the FTAIA. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 9:58 am
Maffick v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:10 pm
Supreme Court: Foreign Produced copies are subject to First Sale Doctrine is a post from: Law Offices of Gordon P. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:17 am
Introduction Judgment of the Supreme Court is handed down today in the case of Janah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“SSFCA”) and Libya, and Benkharbouche v SSFCA. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 1:11 pm
The Mansfield Amendment provides that "No officer or employee of the United States may directly effect an arrest in any foreign country as part of any foreign police action with respect to narcotics control efforts, notwithstanding any other provision of law. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 1:02 pm
Similarly, in Durkee v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm
Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) and the courts should translate foreign terms that are generic or merely descriptive in their home country, because allowing such marks would cause unexpected harms for competition.This is a fascinating paper that warrants serious thinking, and perhaps re-thinking, of how trademark law currently treats foreign terms.What's the harm, we might ask? [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Watkins v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 1:55 am
Image: Flickr.com R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 42 In a nutshell The Government’s flagship scheme to deport foreign criminals first and hear their appeals later was ruled by the Supreme Court to be incompatible with the appellants’ right to respect for their private and family life (reversing the decision below). [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
Patent and Trademark Office that infringes or dilutes a similar mark. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
While in Norex Petroleum Ltd. v. [read post]
